Campus LAN architecture
Access and distribution design, Layer 2 and Layer 3 boundaries, addressing, routing, segmentation, redundancy, and management.
IA-02 / Wireless & Campus Network Design
We connect user experience, application needs, wired and wireless access, network security, resiliency, and day-two operations. The design is built around how locations function—not simply around a bill of materials.
A campus refresh, wireless redesign, new location, recurring performance issue, or inconsistent site standard requires an owned architecture.
Campus architecture · wireless design basis · standards · site and migration roadmap
Decisions this work supports
Define repeatable patterns for switching, routing, wireless, segmentation, management, redundancy, and site variation.
Connect coverage, capacity, roaming, authentication, application behavior, and failure conditions to measurable requirements.
Make monitoring, configuration standards, lifecycle, troubleshooting, ownership, and change practices part of the design.
Architecture scope
The exact boundary is agreed around the decision. Relevant dependencies remain visible even when they sit outside the hands-on scope.
Access and distribution design, Layer 2 and Layer 3 boundaries, addressing, routing, segmentation, redundancy, and management.
Coverage and capacity assumptions, client and application profiles, roaming, RF dependencies, SSID strategy, and controller or cloud design.
Authentication, device onboarding, guest and contractor access, network access policy, administrative access, and exception handling.
Reference designs, site tiers, monitoring, configuration governance, documentation, lifecycle, support, and acceptance criteria.
Engagement sequence
Capture site types, user and device populations, applications, constraints, support model, and known service issues.
Requirements baselineReview topology, configurations, RF information, performance evidence, failure paths, and operational practices.
Current-state assessmentDefine campus, wireless, access, security, resilience, management, and standards decisions at the required depth.
Architecture and design setEstablish site sequencing, prerequisites, pilot criteria, validation, handoff expectations, and operational readiness.
Deployment roadmapA concise view of architecture, performance, resilience, security, and operational constraints.
Logical topology, routing and segmentation, access patterns, resilience, management, and design rationale.
Documented coverage, capacity, client, application, authentication, roaming, and validation assumptions.
Repeatable architectures for site tiers, common services, configurations, documentation, and acceptance.
Prioritized sites, dependencies, pilot approach, change boundaries, validation, and ownership.
Engagement fit
Questions before scoping
No. Wireless performance depends on switching, routing, authentication, addressing, segmentation, internet and WAN paths, applications, and operations. The engagement can focus on Wi-Fi, but the relevant dependencies remain visible.
Yes. Site tiers, reference architectures, minimum requirements, exception rules, documentation standards, and acceptance criteria can be developed for a repeatable rollout program.
Survey requirements are determined during scoping. Predictive design, onsite measurements, post-install validation, and specialized RF work have different access and tooling requirements and should be named explicitly.
Yes. Application behavior, roaming sensitivity, latency, device capabilities, density, availability, and environmental constraints should be captured as design inputs rather than treated as afterthoughts.
Start with the decision
A high-level description is enough to begin defining requirements, boundaries, dependencies, and the right architecture output.
Engagements can be delivered remotely, on site, or through a hybrid model. Location, scheduling, site access, and any travel requirements are agreed during scoping.