Architecture review & current-state assessment
Use when the environment, documentation, or inherited design no longer gives decision-makers a reliable picture.
Current-state view · gaps and dependencies · decision priorities04 / Infrastructure & Network Architecture Advisory
We help teams design and evolve secure, supportable infrastructure across campus, branch, data center, cloud-connected, and remote-site environments. The work connects business requirements, network security, performance, resilience, operations, and lifecycle cost—without forcing a particular vendor or product.
Start a project briefA network redesign, SD-WAN initiative, refresh, migration, expansion, or security modernization needs independent architecture leadership.
Current/target-state architecture · network design decisions · phased roadmap
Architecture engagement paths
The work can begin with an independent second opinion, continue into detailed design, or provide decision and design assurance alongside an incumbent integrator. Each path is scoped around the decision, the client’s delivery model, and the artifacts needed next.
Use when the environment, documentation, or inherited design no longer gives decision-makers a reliable picture.
Current-state view · gaps and dependencies · decision prioritiesUse when a modernization, expansion, migration, or resilience objective needs an implementation-ready technical direction.
Target state · design rationale · standards and migration planUse when platforms, providers, proposals, or commercial options need to be compared against agreed requirements.
Requirements matrix · normalized options · evaluation recordUse when an integrator or internal team is building the solution and independent continuity is needed through delivery.
Design review · exception record · acceptance and readiness criteriaQuestions this work answers
Which business, application, security, and operational requirements should drive the design?
How should segmentation, routing, wireless, LAN, WAN, SD-WAN, cloud connectivity, and internet edges work together?
Where do availability, performance, security, cost, and operability create meaningful tradeoffs?
Evidence model
Important conclusions are tied to affected scope, supporting evidence, decision context, and a practical next step.
Synthetic example only—clearly marked as illustrative, not client work.
Current-state topology, traffic paths, and dependencies
REVIEWBusiness, application, security, and operational requirements
VALIDATETarget-state decisions, design rationale, and migration phases
PRIORITIZEScope design
Exact scope, access, communication, and deliverables are agreed before the work begins.
Typical activities
Current-state infrastructure and topology assessment
Business, application, and technical requirements discovery
Network security, segmentation, and trust-boundary design
Campus LAN, wireless, WAN, and SD-WAN architecture
Resilience, routing, connectivity, and migration planning
Requirements-led platform, provider, and proposal evaluation
Independent design review and migration assurance
Current-state and target-state diagrams
↗High-level and detailed network design
↗Architecture decision record
↗Network security and segmentation recommendations
↗WAN or SD-WAN strategy and phased migration roadmap
↗Requirements and vendor-evaluation matrix
↗Design-assurance, exception, and acceptance record
↗Engagement fit
Scope clarity
Questions before scoping
Yes. Requirements, tradeoffs, operations, security, resilience, and lifecycle fit lead the decision. Product evaluation can follow those criteria without starting from a predetermined platform.
The engagement can stop at current and target state, or continue into high-level design, detailed design, decision records, standards, migration phases, and implementation review when those outputs are agreed.
At the beginning. Trust boundaries, identity, segmentation, management access, visibility, resilience, and operating ownership are treated as design requirements—not controls added after connectivity is chosen.
Architecture specialty index
Each specialty applies the same requirements-first discipline to a different layer of the environment—from trust boundaries to campus access, wide-area connectivity, and the modernization roadmap.
Vendor-neutral network security architecture for segmentation, secure access, trust boundaries, resilient edge design, and practical modernization.
Explore →IA-02Vendor-neutral wireless and campus network design covering switching, routing, Wi-Fi, secure access, capacity, resilience, standards, and operational readiness.
Explore →IA-03Independent WAN and SD-WAN strategy covering topology, transport, path policy, security, cloud and internet access, resilience, provider dependencies, and migration.
Explore →IA-04A structured infrastructure architecture assessment connecting current-state topology, technical debt, resilience, security, operations, target-state decisions, and investment sequencing.
Explore →Start with the decision
A high-level description is enough to begin defining scope, boundaries, and the right decision-ready output.
Engagements can be delivered remotely, on site, or through a hybrid model. Location, scheduling, site access, and any travel requirements are agreed during scoping.