Cloud security baseline
Microsoft 365 Baseline Review
See the tenant as one security system by correlating identity, configuration, and control evidence.
Published package price and scope. Availability, authorization, and final applicable terms are confirmed before work begins; public self-registration is not currently available.
Service overview
A bounded service for a specific decision.
This package reviews one eligible Microsoft 365 tenant using Prowler and Maester baseline evidence, then correlates the results into a staff-reviewed findings set. The goal is to give leadership and administrators a coherent view of material baseline conditions instead of two disconnected tool outputs.
Coverage depends on supported connector permissions, tenant configuration, and available evidence. The review identifies observed conditions and practical priorities; it is not a certification, attestation, or automatic remediation service.
What this service clarifies
Three questions the work is designed to answer.
The package stays useful by keeping the evidence, output, and decision inside a defined boundary.
- 01
Which Microsoft 365 baseline conditions materially affect identity and tenant security?
- 02
Where do multiple observations point to one underlying control issue?
- 03
What should administrators and leadership address first?
Delivery framework
Controlled from intake through handoff.
Staff time includes preparation, analysis, customer interaction, and reporting—not only meeting time.
- 01
Confirm eligibility
Verify the tenant, enabled human member-account count, authorization, and supported access requirements.
- 02
Collect baseline evidence
Run the approved Prowler and Maester review paths using the accepted connector permissions.
- 03
Correlate findings
Reconcile overlapping observations, evidence gaps, and tenant context into a reviewed register.
- 04
Brief and verify
Deliver priorities and perform one eligible same-scope retest after customer remediation.
What you receive
Artifacts that preserve scope, evidence, and next ownership.
Exact output reflects the accepted scope and available evidence. Every package retains the boundaries needed to interpret the result responsibly.
Tenant coverage summary
Account boundary, permissions used, collection status, and known evidence limitations.
Correlated findings register
Staff-reviewed findings that reduce duplicated or disconnected tool observations.
Priority roadmap
Practical actions for identity, configuration, and tenant-control owners.
Eligible same-scope retest
One bounded verification cycle for the original tenant and baseline conditions.
Scope record
What is included—and what is not.
Payment alone does not authorize access, testing, or production change. Named scope, consent, access, timing, and any safety conditions are confirmed before activity begins.
- Prowler and Maester baseline review
- Correlated, staff-reviewed findings and reporting
- One baseline and one eligible same-scope retest
An authorized tenant, confirmed member-account count and supported connector permissions. Missing permissions or evidence can limit coverage.
Additional tenants, Azure subscriptions, Google Workspace, certification, permission changes, remediation and ongoing monitoring are not included.
Service window: Intake is due within 30 days after payment. The service term runs for 90 days after scope acceptance, subject to the accepted order terms. These are service windows—not guaranteed turnaround times.
Good fit when
The package matches the question and boundary.
- One Microsoft 365 tenant supports up to 100 enabled human member accounts
- Leadership needs a practical baseline before a security improvement initiative
- Administrators want reviewed, correlated priorities
Choose a tailored scope when
The requirement extends beyond the package.
- You need Azure subscription or multi-tenant coverage
- You require an attestation or certification outcome
- You need TechGeeks to make live tenant changes or provide ongoing monitoring
Service questions
Practical answers before you proceed.
01Why use both Prowler and Maester?
The tools examine overlapping and complementary baseline conditions. TechGeeks correlates the evidence so the deliverable is organized around control and decision context rather than separate tool reports.
02What if connector permissions are incomplete?
The review records the limitation and proceeds only where supported evidence is available. Missing permissions may reduce coverage and are not treated as proof that a control is effective.
03Is this a Microsoft certification or compliance audit?
No. It is a security baseline review of one accepted tenant. It does not certify the tenant, attest compliance, or provide legal conclusions.
Customer dashboard
Review the package, then continue through the controlled service process.
Existing customers can view the service catalog in the dashboard. Need access? Use the project brief to request customer access without sending credentials or sensitive evidence by email.